All posts tagged Joseph Biden

US Public Diplomacy Failure to Reach Out to the Russians After Terrorist Attack in Ingushetia – FreeMediaOnline.org (Free Media Online Blog)

unitedstatesinformationagencyseal200

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo. FreeMediaOnline.org, Free Media Online Blog, GovoritAmerika.us, Commentary by Ted Lipien, August 18, 2009, San Francisco — Ever since the United States Information Agency (USIA) was dismantled in a foolish post-Cold War cost-cutting move, the U.S. State Department and American diplomats abroad have not been able to present a coherent message to foreign audiences quickly and effectively. The latest example is the lame U.S. public response to the terrorist attack in Ingushetia — no phone call from President Obama to President Medvedev, just a short written statement which was not easily available. There was no statement from Secretary Clinton.

 

Even though the lack of a proper U.S. response was not deliberate and can be blamed on the distraction with the health care reform and just plain bureaucratic incompetence, the Russian leaders and the Russian public have a reason to wonder how badly the Obama Administration wants Russia’s support in combating terrorism and restraining Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Americans, on the other hand, should be concerned how professional and how effective is America’s public diplomacy, which aims to inform and influence public opinion abroad to make it more sympathetic to U.S. interests. The ultimate aim is to make America safer by strengthening and promoting security and democracy worldwide. Yet, few within the government bureaucracy in Washington seem to grasp that ineffective public diplomacy threatens America’s safety. FreeMediaOnline.org (Free Media Online Blog)>>

 

ГоворитАмерика.us GovoritAmerika.us Выбор ГоворитАмерика.us GovoritAmerika.us. Вы можете скопировать и использовать эту статью. You can copy and use this report. Подписка на рассылку ГоворитАмерика.us по электронной почте. Подписка на рассылку ГоворитАмерика.us.

  • Share/Bookmark

Model Interactive Website Touted As Replacement for Voice of America Radio to Russia Attracts No Comments from Users

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo. FreeMediaOnline.org & Free Media Online Blog Commentary by Ted Lipien. September 12, 2008, San Francisco — The model website, which the staff of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) says will be used to create a new interactive platform as replacement for broadcasting VOA radio programs to Russia, has solicited no comments from international users despite being up for a few weeks.  All VOA radio broadcasts to Russia were terminated on orders from the BBG on July 26. 12 days later Russia attacked Georgia.

Screenshot from Voice of America USAVotes2008 Website.FreeMediaOnline.org has obtained a copy of the “VOA Russian Options Paper,”  which claims that VOA Russian Service can have a successful Internet-only presence in Russia. This claim is astounding since no other major government broadcaster has dropped its radio programs and opted for Internet-only strategy in targeting an audience of another world power ruled by an authoritarian government. Prime Minister Putin’s government controls most of the domestic media and limits free speech. Its security services have been accused of sabotaging the Internet during the war in Georgia.

 The “VOA Russian Options Paper” is remarkable not only for its naive political assumptions, such as using Russian companies believed to be run by the Russian security services in charge of monitoring the Internet. The proposal is also remarkable for its underlying claim that the Voice of America cannot have both radio and Internet presence in Russia at the same time because there is no money for both. The BBG bureaucrats have discovered what nobody else knows: rather than being an engine for improving efficiency and providing an inexpensive forum for exchanging information, the Internet at the BBG can be just as expensive, if not more expensive than traditional broadcast media. 

Screenshot of For those like me who have worked in government, the BBG paper is a clear indication that the project would be vastly overpriced, duplicating already existing Internet initiatives, and designed largely for the benefit of government contractors. It does not answer the essential question why for a country that desperately needs uncensored American news and opinions, Internet-only strategy is better than radio-TV-and-Internet strategy. Some people may be fooled that it is all about the money when in fact it is all about bureaucratic politics, conflicts of interest, and well-paid government consultants.

A good indication of how this project might work, or rather how it will fail if the BBG staff remains in charge of its implementation, is the Voice of America’s new USAVotes2008.com interactive website. This is how it was touted in the BBG paper:

Screenshot from Voice of America USAVotes2008 Website.VOA Model
The site [new VOA Russian interactive site] would be modeled on VOA’s content-rich election Web site, USAVotes2008.com.  USAVotes2008.com provides a platform for social networking about the American election in November.

FreeMediaOnline.org has learned that the model site cost tens of thousands of dollars to develop. Users are encouraged to go to the “Issues” page and leave their comments. The page has been up for a few weeks with no comments from users even though it can be read by anybody in the world with access to the Internet who understands English. Readers of Free Media Online Blog may want to leave some comments on the model VOA site to spare the BBG and the U.S. government any further embarrassment. (Sorry, I could not resist making this comment.)

The great tragedy is, of course, that VOA radio broadcasts to Russia have been terminated at a critical time, as the recent events in Georgia have demonstrated. But on Thursday, when they had a chance to redeem themselves before Congress and the American public, several members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors refused to take a vote to restore these broadcasts, as well VOA radio programs to Georgia, Ukraine and other countries, which are also to be terminated.

The Broadcasting Board of Governors New Website with A Picture of Buddhist Monks.These prominent Americans may have been too busy admiring their own new and flashy promotional website with a Home page picture of Buddhist monks, but  which has no permanent references to the BBG mission in support of human rights and democracy. The picture is ironic, because the BBG had tried earlier to reduce VOA and Radio Free Asia (RFA) broadcasts to Tibet. They had to back down after a group of Tibetan monks staged a peaceful protest on Capital Hill and the U.S. Congress forced the Board to rescind their decision.

According to FreeMediaOnline.org sources, during the BBG meeting in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, two Democratic Board members: Jeff Hirschberg and Edward Kaufman blocked the motion to have a vote on restoring VOA broadcasts, which was introduced by a Republican member, radio broadcaster Blanquita Cullum, the only working journalist on the current Board. (The others are political operatives and businessmen, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is an ex officio member.) Faced with the opposition from Hirschberg, Kaufman, and the BBG executive director Jeff Trimble, the remaining BBG members did not support Cullum’s request.

Letter to BBG from Rep. Jim McDermott and Rep. Joe Wilson protesting the planned termination of the Voice of America radio service in Hindi to India.The Internet-only VOA project for Russia is spectacularly risky and depends strongly on the acquiescence of the Putin government. It guarantees that American news from Washington would not reach people in areas of conflict and poverty who have no access to the Internet.

This elitist, cynical and arrogant approach to international broadcasting taken by the BBG was indirectly exposed in a recent letter from the two Co-Chairmen of the Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Americans, Rep. Jim McDermott and Rep. Joe Wilson, who protested against the planned termination of VOA Hindi radio service to India. They stressed in their letter to the BBG that  over 70% of the Indian population lives in rural villages, many with no access to TV or the Internet.

Despite the serious risks and limitations of their plan, Hirschberg, Kaufman and Trimble are said to favor the Internet-only strategy for VOA in Russia largely because it serves their personal preferences and bureaucratic needs. They want all radio broadcasting to Russia to be done exclusively by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), a semi-private entity based in Prague and in Moscow, which is also funded by Congress through the BBG.

These three individuals all have strong personal or political links to this radio station, which has been steeped lately in controversy about its ability to maintain independence and support for democratic values while operating within a close reach of Russia’s security services. Human rights groups and media freedom activists have criticized RFE/RL for airing comments expressing confidence in Mr. Putin’s leadership and for giving airtime to local extremist politicians known for their racist views.

The BBG has already deprived the United States of the powerful symbol represented by VOA radio broadcasts to Russia from the nation’s capital, the center of the American government. Mr. Putin and other Russian officials are not likely to pay any attention to a website they can easily block if a major crisis erupted between the two countries. As to the Internet-only strategy, the example of the Voice of America USAVotes2008.com model website also does not bode well at all for the prospect of reaching large audiences in Russia with news and persuasive American commentary that is untainted by self-censorship and racist messages.

The BBG staff should have noted that Mr. Putin did not bother to go after such websites in Russia because he does not view them as threatening. He did go, however, after independent radio and TV stations and silenced many independent journalists. At least 292 journalists have been killed or have disappeared in Russia since 1990 with very few perpetrators being charged. In any case, the secret police is already sabotaging the Internet and can close down access to unwanted websites at any time.

The State Department's Russian speakers in Russia and elsewhere already have access to a number of U.S. government  sponsored websites, which to a large extent duplicate each other’s work. The State Department’s Russian-language website has much of the same information and looks largely the same as the VOA website. One could suspect that both were designed by the same well-paid  outside consultant. There is also the RFE/RL Russian-language website.

The main reason behind the BBG initiative was not to develop yet another VOA Russian website but to deprive the Voice of America of the ability to reach the Russian people with on air radio that cannot be easily igored or completely jammed. We can only speculate why this insane plan succeeded, but the links between Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Senator Biden are well known, and his staff is said to have helped Jeff Trimble take VOA radio off the air in great secrecy in late July so that other members of Congress would not be alerted. Governor Kaufman was a former chief of staff to Senator Biden and is now helping him in his run for the White House. There are then business links between Governor Hirschberg and Russia and his contacts with Mr. Putin’s associates, as well as Jeff Trimble’s own links with RFE/RL and the Russian management of RFE/RL’s Moscow bureau.

But in addition to any larger political and bureaucratic reasons, it is almost certain that most of the money from dropping Screenshot of VOA Russian Website.VOA radio programs would be spent not on  VOA Russian broadcasters but on BBG managers and inside Internet specialists, as well as outside consultants who are probably friends and acquaintances of BBG members and their staff. After all, one of the former BBG members — said to be the most recent BBG chairman James Glassman who is now Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs – had suggested that the Board should hire former ABC and CNN television newscaster Paula Zahn as their public relations guru. She had good sense to turn them down.

Congress should likewise refuse to accept the BBG’s termination of VOA radio programs to Russia, Georgia, Ukraine and other countries. VOA must expand its Internet outreach in Russia, but the BBG’s Internet-only strategy will not have any greater impact than the struggling USAVotes2008.com website.

This VOA model website developed under the guidance of the BBG staff is still waiting for you to post your first user comments. Go ahead and do it, but please note that you are a supporter of resuming VOA radio to Russia and to other countries without free media.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sarah Palin Has Lived Pope John Paul II’s Vision of a Feminist Christian Woman

Sarah Palin

Ted Lipien, author of “Wojtyla’s Women: How They Shaped the Life of Pope John Paul II and Changed the Catholic Church,” said that Sarah Palin can be described as a new feminist Christian woman who has followed the most important rules for marriage and families set by the Polish Pontiff.

 

 

According to Ted Lipien, Pope John Paul II generally approved of professional careers for women as long as they did not interfere with their duties as wives and mothers. One of the late Pope’s closest collaborators and advisors on the use of contraceptives was a female medical doctor, ex-prisoner of Nazi concentration camps and victim of Nazi medical experiments on women, Dr. Wanda Poltawska. After World War II, she married and raised a family while maintaining an active psychiatric practice in Krakow. She and Cardinal Wojtyla worked together to establish homes for unwed mothers and she trained women in using natural birth control methods. Cardinal Wojtyla, who for many years was a philosophy professor at the Catholic University in Lublin, also promoted academic careers of several nuns.

 

Link to www.tedlipien.com September 10, 2008, San Francisco – Ted Lipien, who wrote a book about the role of remarkable women in the life of Pope John Paul II, said that the late leader of the Catholic Church would have liked Governor Sarah Palin’s positions on abortion, marriage, family life, and motherhood, and would have approved of her accomplishments as a Christian politician and her work outside of the home.

 

Ted Lipien, who interviewed Cardinal Wojtyla shortly before he became pope, noted, however, that the Polish Pontiff was strongly opposed to many Western liberal views on women and did not approve of the use of the pill and other artificial contraceptives. On the use of contraception, Sarah Palin’s position may not be totally in line with the view held of Pope John Paul II.

 

The Polish Pontiff once said that “social advancement of women has in it a little bit of truth but also a great deal of error,” and was strongly opposed to ordaining women priests. But he also held progressive views on issues relating to marriage and sex and in one of his early books wrote approvingly of the role of sex in marriage and even stressed the importance of female orgasm. He incorporated these views into his theology of the body teachings. He promoted his Christian vision of “New Feminism,” which accepted many of the positions of the feminist movement but also rejected many of the views held by secular feminists, particularly those who supported Marxist feminism.

 

 

John Paul II insisted that abortion is not justified even in case of rape, a position which Sarah Palin apparently also shares. He strongly supported legislation banning abortion and did not consider Catholic politicians who are pro choice as truly Christian and Catholic. He would not consider as acceptable a statement from Senator Joe Biden, a Catholic who is a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, that personally he is prepared to accept the Catholic Church teaching that life begins at conception but is still pro choice.

 

 

According to Ted Lipien, John Paul II would have been appalled that the majority of Catholic politicians who competed in the 2008 presidential primaries have been strongly pro-choice, including: Senator Biden (D), Christopher Dodd (D), Rudolph Giuliani (R), Dennis Kucinich (D), and Bill Richardson (D). Only Senator Sam Brownback (R) and Alan Keyes (R), among former candidates who are Catholic, are pro-life.

 

 

Barak Obama (D), Hillary Clinton (D), Sarah Palin (R) and Senator McCain (R) belong to Protestant Christian Churches. Both Obama and Clinton are strongly pro-choice, while both McCain and Palin are pro-life.

 

On other social issues, including health care for the poor, social security, immigration, and the death penalty, Pope John Paul II held strongly liberal views, according to Ted Lipien. John Paul II once said that the United States was “a continent marked by competition and aggressiveness, unbridled consumerism and corruption.” In addition to abortion, John Paul II was particularly troubled by the growing support among Americans for ordination of women priests and social and legal acceptance of gay marriages.

 

 

Ted Lipien’s book “Wojtyla’s Women: How They Shaped the Life of Pope John Paul II and Changed the Catholic Church” is now available on Amazon. Ted Lipien, who has worked for over 30 years as an international journalist and was director of the Polish Service of the Voice of America (VOA), also describes in his book how the Polish communist secret police fabricated a diary in an attempt to convince Western journalists that Cardinal Wojtyla had an affair with a woman associate. He also describes how communist agents spied on the Pope in Krakow and at the Vatican.

 

Ted Lipien is now president of media freedom nonprofit FreeMediaOnline.org. He lives in San Francisco. For more information about the book, visit Ted Lipien’s website: TedLipien.com.

 

This post may be republished with attribution to TedLipien.com.

 

Sarah Palin at Chambliss Rally. Photo by Bruce Tuten, Savannah, Georgia, United States. This photo is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License.

  • Share/Bookmark

U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors Tired to Hire Paula Zahn As Their Public Relations Guru While Cutting Radio Programs to Countries Without Free Media

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo.FreeMediaOnline.org & Free Media Online Blog, September 8, 2008, San Francisco — Perhaps Paula Zahn, formerly of CNN and ABC, could have explained to the White House, the U.S. Congress and the American people why the Voice of America (VOA) Russian-language radio programs were not being heard in the war zone in Georgia, or in Russia itself, when the Russian troops invaded their small neighbor on August 8. Twelve days earlier, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which tried to hire Paula Zahn as their public relations guru, had shut down all VOA radio broadcasts to Russia, and was about to shut down VOA radio to Georgia. But Paula Zahn will not be calling the White House or the Vice President’s Office with a message to ignore complaints from human rights activists in Georgia and Ukraine, the two countries under pressure from Russia Mr. Cheney visited last week. The BBG failed to hire Paula Zahn because in the end she turned them down.

The same small group of now five Americans (not counting Condoleezza Rice who is an ex officio member of the BBG)  had tried earlier to reduce VOA radio broadcasts to Tibet and to a number of other countries without free media. They justify these moves as designed to save money for other projects, including the mismanaged broadcasting to the Middle East and the expansion of news websites.  Sources have told FreeMediaOnline.org, however, that the BBG was planning to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on enhancing its public relations efforts, including the beefing up of its own promotional website, which they launched today. The BBG, which is a bipartisan body, is responsible for making sure U.S. taxpayers’ money is spent wisely on international broadcasts.

According to FreeMediaOnline.org sources, the BBG has consistently put a high priority on itself while cutting and reducing U.S. broadcasts to people around the world who are deprived of free access to information and live under repressive regimes. Most of the BBG members are successful  U.S. businessmen and political operatives with no experience of life under dictatorship or significant activism in defense of human rights.  These Democrats and Republicans are appointed by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

Inside sources have told FreeMediaOnline.org that Paula Zahn had good sense to decline the job offer. No reason for her refusal was mentioned, but she may have learned of the outrage among the human rights activists after the BBG  had announced plans to reduce VOA and Radio Free Asia (RFA) programs to Tibet. After protests by the Tibetan monks on Capital Hill, the U.S. Congress, which was opposed to any reduction of programming to Tibet, stepped in and forced the BBG to reverse its decision.

BBG Member Blanquita Cullum reportedly voted against cuts in U.S. broadcasting to Russia, Georgia, Tibet, and other media-at-risk countries.The same sources also told FreeMediaOnline.org that only one BBG member, radio broadcaster Blanquita Cullum, questioned the decision to hire a media celebrity while radio programs to countries without free press were being cut. She was reported to have said that if the rest of the Board proceeded with hiring a new high profile spokesperson, “it would be over her dead body.” Cullum, who is a Republican, is also said to be the only member of the bipartisan Board who has consistently opposed  U.S. radio programming cuts to countries without free media.

FreeMediaOnline.org reported earlier that the Senate Staff of Senator Joe Biden worked with some of the BBG members and their executive director to help them take VOA radio programs to Russia off the air despite strong opposition to this move from most of the other members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats. Shutting down VOA Russian-language broadcasting is seen as helpful to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) – a semi-private station also managed by the BBG — which is incorporated in Delaware, Senator Biden’s home state. RFE/RL has also been steeped in controversy. A human rights organization in Russia has recently criticized  RFE/RL for giving airtime to an extremist Russian politician known for expressing racist views about immigrants.

Other critics have suggested that airing of such programs by RFE/RL journalists, who are Russian citizens working and living in Russia with their families – where they are exposed to intimidation by the Kremlin’s secret police – makes RFE/RL unsuitable to be the only radio voice of American taxpayers in Russia and to reflect American values. The Voice of America programs to Russia, which were cut by the BBG, were produced by journalists based in Washington, D.C.

BBG Member Jeff HirschbergThe BBG members who supported cutting VOA programs to Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, and Tibet are: Joaquin Balaya, chairman of Balaya Media Inc.; Jeff Hirschberg, a partner of in Kalorama Partners, a consulting firm that deals with corporate governance and risk assessment and a director of the U.S-Russia Business Council; Edward E. Kaufman, Senator Biden’s former chief of staff who is now president of Public Strategies, a political and management consulting firm based in Wilmington, Delaware; and Steven J. Simmons, chairman and CEO of Patriot Media and Communications, LLC.

James K. Glassman, Former BBG Chairman, Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public AffairsThree seats on the Board currently are empty, after the recent departure of former BBG Chairman James K. Glassman, who also favored program cuts at VOA. Glassman is now the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. According to FreeMediaOnline.org sources, Glassman was responsible for proposing to hire Paula Zahn.

A statement issued recently by the leadership of the Voice of America employees’ union, AFGE Local 1812, said that the Broadcasting Board of Governors “has been responsible for one blunder after another — to the point that its actions have compromised U.S. strategic interests.” Saying that “the elimination of Russian and Georgian radio broadcasts should be the last straw,” the VOA employees’ union leaders called on Congress to act immediately to dissolve the Broadcasting Board of Governors. The BBG announced that Wednesday, September 10, it is sponsoring  a workshop on “New Media vs. New Censorship: The Authoritarian Assault on Information.”

The newly redesigned BBG website, launched at a considerable cost to U.S. taxpayers a few weeks after cutting VOA radio to Russia, says that the Board’s mission is “to promote freedom and democracy.” That statement, however, does not appear on the “Home” page or “About the Agency” page; it can only be found by searching the site. At least 292 journalists have been murdered or have disappeared in Russia since 1990. The Reporters Without Borders, a media freedom nonprofit organization, said in its 2008 annual report on Russia that “the government and security forces did all they could to stop the media reporting on Putin’s opponents.”

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

U.S. Jamming Its Own Radio Broadcasts In A Crisis With Russia

Bureaucratic Jamming Of U.S. Broadcasts To Russia, Georgia And UkraineVoice of America Broadcasting Facility.

 

 

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo.FreeMediaOnline.org & Free Media Online Blog, September 7, 2008, San Francisco — Political jamming originating in Washington rather than Soviet-style electronic jamming of radio signals made it impossible for the Russian speakers in the war zone in Georgia and in Russia itself to hear Voice of America (VOA) news broadcasts during the recent crisis in the Caucasus. Throughout the Cold War, the Soviet Union resorted to electronic jamming of VOA radio broadcasts each time a major conflict erupted between Washington and Moscow. BBG Website Logo.

But during the most recent emergency caused by Russia’s attack on Georgia, the jamming of VOA radio was done not by the Kremlin but by the U.S. Government’s own agency, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG). The Soviet-era  jamming of radio signals was only partially effective, as determined radio listeners were usually able to fine tune their receivers to overcome the electronic interference with the radio program. This time, bureaucratic jammers in Washington completely silenced Russian-language news broadcasts from the Voice of America just as hostilities in the Caucasus region were about to flare up.

U.S. Radio Goes Silent 12 Days Before Russia Attacks Georgia — Bush And Cheney Try To Reassure Nervous Allies

Vice President Cheney and President Yushchenko of Ukraine in Kiev, September 5, 2008. Twelve days before the crisis erupted, the Broadcasting Board of Governors, an independent bipartisan body which manages all U.S. Government-sponsored civilian broadcasts, put an end to all on-air Voice of America radio programs in Russian. The BBG was also about to stop all VOA radio programs to Georgia and Ukraine, the two countries under pressure from Russia. Both of these countries were visited this week by Vice President Dick Cheney who said in Tbilisi that Americans “stand in solidarity with the people of Georgia” and assured the Ukrainians of America’s “unwavering determination to strengthen the bonds between our countries — not just now, but for the long term.”

[Read Vice President Cheney's Comments in Georgia and in Ukraine.]

 

BBG’s political jamming of the Voice of America radio to Russia resulted in silencing of VOA broadcasts. Here you can listen to Soviet-style jamming.

 

You can also hear the first Voice of America Russian-language radio broadcast to the Soviet Union on February 17, 1947. The last broadcast was on July 26, 2008. Russia attacked Georgia on August 8, 2008.

Also this week, President Bush announced  a $1 billion aid package for Georgia. By closing down the VOA Georgian service, the BBG wanted to save a few hundred thousand dollars. According to FreeMediaOnline.org sources, the BBG wanted more money to expand its public affairs operation and intended to hire a U.S. media celebrity as its spokesperson. Neither President Bush nor Vice President Cheney have made any references to the BBG-funded broadcasts during the current crisis with Russia. [Read President Bush's Statement on Georgia.]

Senator Joe Biden’s Staff Said To Have Helped Take VOA Off The Air

Senator Joseph Biden.The President had no reason to praise the BBG because, in an incredible twist of Washington politics, the Senate staff of Senator Joe Biden was said to have worked against the wishes of most members of Congress by helping the BBG bureaucrats to achieve their longtime goal of shutting down VOA Russian broadcasts — a move made by the BBG in late July without any public announcement, just days before Russia attacked Georgia. Most members of Congress have been strongly against ending VOA radio broadcasts to media-at-risk countries, including Russia and Ukraine, and in previous years managed to stop the BBG from implementing some of the proposed program cuts.

Senator Biden was said to be in favor of closing down Voice of America Russian radio from Washington to benefit another U.S. government-funded broadcaster, the semi-private Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), which is based in Prague and Moscow. RFE/RL is incorporated in Delaware, Senator Biden’s home state. President Bush and the White House staff were, however, equally at fault for the bureaucratic jamming of the Voice of America when they did not question the BBG’s recommendations to cut programs to Russia, Georgia, Ukraine, Tibet, and several other countries.

Voice of America LogoFormer U.S. presidents, including President Reagan, frequently mentioned and praised the work of the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty broadcasters during various crises in relations with Moscow. The decisions made by the BBG left no room for presidential praise during the most recent crisis over the Russian military intervention in Georgia.

 

After silencing the Voice of America radio to Russia and being aware of its decision to end VOA radio broadcasts to Georgia and Ukraine, the BBG has shown very little activity, issuing just one press release long after the Russian attack on Georgia.

 

The press release, carefully crafted by the BBG staff involved in shutting down VOA broadcasts, reminded the remaining four* VOA Georgian broadcasters in Washington D.C. that while their programs might continue “for the foreseeable future,” “the Administration’s FY 2008 budget, as approved by Congress, provided that all BBG broadcasting to Georgia was to be done by RFE/RL after September 30, 2008.” The press release failed to mention that most members of Congress would have opposed VOA programming cuts if they were put to a vote.

 

*The Voice of America Georgian service, which the BBG wanted to close down, was reduced to six persons. When the war started, two broadcasters were on leave in Georgia. The remaining four were fighting exhaustion and worked with hardly any days off. They barely managed to double their airtime from 30 minutes to one hour daily. In similar previous news emergencies before the BBG was put in charge of U.S. international broadcasting, VOA had sufficient resources and was able to significantly increase airtime to Russia, Poland, and other countries.

Exposure To Secret Police Intimidation

The KGB Emblem.The BBG’s preference for overseas-based private broadcasters rather than Washington-based and Congressionally-chartered Voice of America has also put American broadcasting resources at risk in a number of countries in Eurasia by exposing them to pressures from local regimes and  local stations rebroadcasting U.S. sponsored programs, which are usually under tight regime control. By operating safely from Munich in West Germany during the Cold War, RFE/RL engaged in highly effective ”surrogate broadcasting” to Russia and was largely protected from reprisals by the KGB. But as a result of decisions made by the BBG, most of RFE/RL Russian radio programs now originate in Russia. The majority of Radio Liberty Russian broadcasters are Russian citizens who live in Russia with their families.

Despite the murders and disappearances of at least 292 journalists in Russia since 1990, the Broadcasting Board of Governors continued to support the expansion of RFE/RL operations in Russia and its large Moscow bureau, while reducing and eventually eliminating all Voice of America Russian radio broadcasts from Washington. This policy continued even as Russian President and later Prime Minister  Vladimir Putin kept closing down Russian media outlets critical of his policies, and more independent journalists were being killed.

Radio Liberty Managers Put A Positive Spin On The Murder Of A Pro-Democracy Journalist

Independent Russian Journalist Anna Politkovskaya Who Was Murdered in 2006.Shortly after independent Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya was murdered in Moscow in an execution-style hit in 2006, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty managers made public statements strongly suggesting an attempt on their part to appease Mr. Putin. In an apparent effort to protect their presence in the country, the head of RFE/RL Moscow bureau, Elena Glushkova, said in an on-air discussion in October 2006 that the work of Radio Liberty journalists cannot cause Russia any harm. She insisted that RFE/RL reporters respect and love Russia. She also pointed out that all Radio Liberty reporters who work in Russia are Russian citizens and said that her optimism despite the murder of Ms. Politkovskaya is based in her belief in “the common sense of the current Russian leadership.” Maria Klain, Russian Service director at the RFE/RL home office in Prague, also expressed confidence that the radio’s future in Russia looks good. These comments surprised and offended pro-democracy activists in Russia who were still in mourning after Anna Politovskaya’s murder.

BBG Members Ignore Risks in Authoritarian States

Broadcasting Board of Governors Member Jeff Hirschberg.Broadcasting Board of Governors Member Edward E. Kaufman.Earlier, BBG member Jeff Hirschberg, a Washington lawyer who is a director of the U.S.-Russia Business Council, negotiated with Russian officials to keep the RFE/RL Moscow bureau operating while other media outlets in Russia were being taken over on the orders from the Kremlin by Mr. Putin’s associates. Mr. Hirschberg is one of the Democrats on the current Board, as is Edward E. Kaufman, who was formerly Senator Biden’s chief of staff and also a long time supporter of RFE/RL. The BBG executive director, Jeff Trimble, was formerly acting president of RFE/RL.

Most of the Republicans on the Board also voted for the elimination of  VOA radio broadcasts to Russia, Georgia, and Ukraine.Broadcasting Board of Governors Member Blanquita Cullum.The only BBG member who spoke up against these cuts and questioned the BBG strategy in Russia was said to be Blanquita Cullum, who is also the only woman and the only working broadcaster on the current Board. (Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is an ex officio BBG member but does not attend BBG meetings.) Other BBG members have experience in commercial U.S. broadcasting and communications industry. They have no substantive experience in journalism, broadcasting to media-at-risk countries, or human rights activism.

Surrogate Broadcasting Under Secret Police Pressure Does Not Work

Lubyanka, the FSB Headquarters in Moscow. Ted Lipien, president of media freedom nonprofit FreeMediaOnline.org, said that the combination of the BBG policies and the pressure and intimidation from the FSB, the secret police agency which replaced the KGB (Mr. Putin’s former employer), put U.S. government broadcasting resources in Russia and RFE/RL journalists in severe jeopardy. Lipien said that the comments RFE/RL managers made after Ms. Politkovskaya’s murder are a clear proof that the BBG strategy for broadcasting to Russia has affected RFE/RL programming. There is no reason to believe, Lipien said, that RFE/RL journalists in Russia can be safer from the secret police than any other Russian journalist. If anything, they would be prime targets of the FSB operations, Lipien said.

FreeMediaOnline.org President Ted Lipien.Lipien was formerly acting VOA associate director and helped to place BBG-funded radio and TV programs on stations in Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries in the region. He also wrote a book about Pope John Paul II in which he discussed the attempts by the Polish communist secret police and the KGB to spy on the Polish pontiff and feed disinformation to Western journalists. He also described how communist agents tried to infiltrate U.S. radio stations broadcasting to audiences behind the Iron Curtain.

BBG’s Preference For Ratings-Driven Privatized Broadcasting Results In Giving Airtime to Racist Politicians

In a recent report posted on the Free Media Online Blog, The FSB Emblem. The FSB has replaced the KGB as the primary secret police agency in Russia.Lipien wrote that the BBG policies in combination with the risks of operating within close reach of the Kremlin’s secret police have made RFE/RL more like a local Russian media outlet than a surrogate broadcaster the American taxpayers would expect it to be. Recently, the Moscow Human Rights Bureau has criticized RFE/RL for giving an entire hour of airtime to a former Russian Parliament deputy Andrey Savel’yev. The Russian human rights organization said that Mr. Savel’yev’s  “chauvinist and racist views are well-known.”

In criticizing Radio Liberty for giving airtime to Mr. Savel’yev, the Russian human rights organization said Radio Liberty was guilty not only  of enabling such people “to spread their poisonous views,” but also of legitimizing their ideas “in the minds of many impressionable radio listeners.” The appeal, written by the organization’s head Aleksandr Brod, argues that stations, which “in their pursuit of higher ratings” invite such “nationalist radicals,” are giving these enemies of democracy a larger audience and exacerbating ethnic tensions. Lipien said that it seems inconceivable that a broadcasting entity, which works under the watchful eye of Mr. Putin’s secret police and gives airtime to extreme nationalists who promote racism, should from now on be the only on air radio voice of the American people in Russia.

Can U.S. Broadcasting Be Saved?

There is some hope that the crisis in relations between Washington and Moscow may force the BBG to modify its preference for private surrogate broadcasters and reverse some of its policies and programming cuts.  FreeMediaOnline.org president Ted Lipien said that in light of Vice President Cheney’s visists to Georgia and Ukraine and President Bush’s announcement of a $1 billion Georgian aid package, the positions taken by the BBG are hopelessly out of sync not only with the U.S. Congress but also with the White House and are unsustainable.

Others have also criticized the Broadcasting Board of Governors and called for putting an end to the dismantling of the Voice of America.

 

Read The World Still Needs the Voice of Americaby Helle Dale, The Heritage Foundation.

 

The Sound of Silence: The Decline of the Voice of America in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia by Helle C. Dale and Oliver Horn, The Heritage Foundation.

The Broadcasting Board of Governors is scheduled to meet next week. The question of whether to lift the bureaucratic jamming of the Voice of America Russian radio broadcasts, as well as the future of VOA broadcasts to Georgia and Ukraine, are expected to be discussed. 

 Listen To The Last Voice of America Russian Radio Broadcast

Voice of America Russian Website Logo.Listen here to the last Voice of America on-air Russian radio broadcast delivered on July 26, 2008, just twelve days before Russia attacked Georgia.

 

View FreeMediaOnline.org Online Presentation SAVE VOICE OF AMERICA BROADCASTS

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo.View FreeMediaOnline.org Online Presentation in support of saving Voice of America broadcasts to Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, Tibet and other media-at-risk countries.

Make An Online Tax-Deductable Donation to FreeMediaOnline.org.

 

Several people contributed information and ideas for this article.

  • Share/Bookmark

U.S. Broadcasting Board Plans to Cut American News Radio to Ukraine Where Vice President Cheney Visits Today

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo.FreeMediaOnline.org & Free Media Online Blog, September 5, 2008, San Francisco — Even as Vice President Cheney visits Ukraine to show U.S. support for that country in the face of pressure from Russia, the U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), has not given up on its plan to cut the Voice of America (VOA) Ukrainian radio news broadcasts from Washington, D.C. Twelve (12) days before Russia attacked Georgia on August 8, the BBG quietly ended all VOA on-air radio broadcasts to Russia.

The BBG also planned to shut down VOA radio to Georgia, but the Russian invasion temporarily prevented that move. The BBG plans to end all Voice of America on-air radio broadcasts to Ukraine by October 1, 2008 and keep only its Internet and television services. Ted Lipien, president of media freedom nonprofit FreeMediaOnline.org, said that television and Internet are far less effective than radio in an emergency and could not easily reach areas under conflict or occupation, as was demonstrated during the war in Georgia.

The BBG has been criticized by members of Congress and media freedom organizations for ignoring censorship in the region and being unprepared for a news emergency. The BBG claims that radio broadcasting to Russia can be better done from Moscow and Prague by the semi-private Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL).

Ted Lipien – who was earlier acting associate director of VOA and helped BBG place programs on stations in Russia, Ukraine, Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq – said, however, that RFE/RL journalists and resources in Russia are now dangerously exposed to intimidation and control by the Russian secret police. According to the International Federation of Journalists (IJF), 292 Russian journalists have been killed or have disappeared since 1990. Many RFE/RL journalists live and work in Russia. Lipien said that as Russian citizens, these journalists are extremely vulnerable now and would be even more endangered in case of a regional crisis.  News reports have also suggested that the Russian secret police is actively trying to gain control over the media in Ukraine.

The Broadcasting Board of Governors has said that VOA Georgian radio will continue “for the foreseeable future,” but reduced to only four persons, the VOA Georgian Service is working under a great strain. The BBG reiterated that “the Administration’s FY 2008 budget, as approved by Congress, provided that all BBG broadcasting to Georgia was to be done by RFE/RL after September 30, 2008.” It failed to mention that this decision originated with the BBG and that many members of Congress specifically objected to this plan even as they voted for the overall budget. In previous years, Congress had stopped some of the BBG-proposed program cuts to countries where media is still at risk. U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said that his Senate committee intended to provide funding “for broadcasting in languages which the Administration proposed to eliminate in FY09, such as Russian, Kazak, Uzbek, Tibetan and the to the Balkans, where freedom of speech remains restricted and broadcasting is still necessary.”

This year Senator Joe Biden’s staff was said to have worked with the BBG to implement the elimination of the Voice of America radio to Russia before the rest of the Congress could act to stop this move. RFE/RL, which will benefit from program cuts at VOA, is incorporated in Delaware, Senator Biden’s home state. FreeMediaOnline.org president pointed out that while RFE/RL could be very effective under different circumstances, its large operation in Moscow and pressures from the Russian secret police  have endangered its mission. Lipien also said that Voice of America journalists, working in the safe environment of  Washington, D.C., are able to accurately reflect and present American news and opinions to audiences in Russia, Georgia, and Ukraine.

There was no immediate reaction from the BBG to Vice President Cheney’s visit to Georgia and Ukraine or to President Bush’s announcement of a $1 billion aid package for Georgia.

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

U.S. Broadcasting Board Out of Sync with White House on Georgia and Russia

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo.FreeMediaOnline.orgCommentary by Ted Lipien, September 4, 2008, San Francisco – While the White House mobilized in just a few days to put together a $1 billion aid package for Georgia, and President Bush sent Vice President Dick Cheney on a trip to the region, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which oversees all civilian U.S. international broadcasts,  is still in the mode of defending the shutting down of the Voice of America (VOA) radio to Russia and its plan to eliminate eventually all VOA on-air radio to Georgia and Ukraine.

Due to the BBG-ordered cuts, VOA Georgian service has already been reduced to only 4 persons. And in an incredible foreign policy blunder, the BBG ended all VOA radio broadcasts to Russia just 12 days before the Russian troops attacked Georgia. If the war had not started, the BBG would have also cut VOA Georgian radio broadcasts.

Such a glaring example of bad judgment, subsequent inactivity in face of a major crisis, and stubborn defiance has never been seen in more than 60 years of U.S. government-sponsored international broadcasting. By creating the bipartisan Broadcasting Board of Governors in 1998, the White House and the Congress have lost control of U.S. broadcasts to overseas audiences and are now unable to step in quickly to overrule the BBG on questionable program cuts. They also cannot do anything quickly about the Board’s lack of urgent response to a crisis situation.

Before the BBG took over, journalists at the Voice of America would have immediately expanded broadcasts to Russia and Georgia in response to the news emergency and then ask the White House for more money. The BBG took these types of decisions away from the VOA director, who otherwise could have acted quickly and in sync with the Administration and the Congress. In fact, this is what VOA journalists wanted to do this time, but they were told by the VOA management that the BBG considers such requests “a non-starter.”

The Russian broadcasts were taken off the air in late July without any public announcement, most likely to avoid alerting members of Congress. Most Democrats and Republicans in Congress see this move as contributing to Mr. Putin’s campaign to further restrict media freedom in Russia, but so far this year they have been unable to stop the BBG from proceeding with radio programming cuts. (Congress managed to overrule the Bush Administration and the BBG on similar cuts in some previous years, but only with great difficulty and to a limited degree.)

If the White House and the Congress are willing to work overtime to give Georgia $1 billion in  U.S. aid money, it is inconceivable that they would want the Broadcasting Board of Governors to resist restarting VOA radio to Russia and resist plans for a permanent major expansion of VOA Georgian Service, rather than closing it down once the immediate crisis is over.

But politics and special interests may have played a significant and dangerous role in the BBG’s decisions and have contributed to its current paralysis. Senator Biden’s staff was said to have worked with the BBG and its executive director to shut down VOA Russian radio service quickly and without any publicity, so that all U.S. radio broadcasts to Russia would be done from now on by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), which is incorporated in Delaware, Senator Biden’s home state.  One of the BBG members, Edward Kaufman, is Senator Biden’s former chief of staff, and  BBG executive director, Jeff Trimble, was formerly acting president of RFE/RL.

The problem is that RFE/RL has a large news bureau in Moscow, which makes its journalists, who are Russian citizens living with their families in Russia, vulnerable to pressure and intimidation by Mr. Putin’s secret police.  The BBG and RFE/RL management try to minimize the existence of this risk, despite the International Federation of Journalists’ report showing that 292 journalists have been killed or have disappeared in Russia since 1990, with only a handful of perpetrators being convicted.

Jeff Trimble and BBG member Jeff Hirschberg, who is a director of U.S.-Russia Business Council, had conducted negotiations with Russian officials on how RFE/RL could continue its radio presence in Russia, including its large bureau in Moscow. I have argued that the BBG has boxed itself into a corner by insisting on keeping a large news bureau in the authoritarian state, in which Mr. Putin’s secret police can freely intimidate, recruit and silence journalists.

I strongly suspect that the BBG members and Senator Biden’s staff are now afraid to make decisions which could undermine their previous commitments and RFE/RL’s operations in Russia.  They are also afraid to admit that their decision to prevent VOA journalists from broadcasting to Russia from the safety of Washington, D.C. was not only foolish but also motivated by politics and special interests. The BBG has shown no  visible concern for keeping U.S. broadcasting resources safe from the clutches of Russia’s secret police. 

Rather than wait for approval from the BBG, which is unlikely to come, Voice of America director Dan Austin should immediately resume and expand VOA Russian broadcasts. He should also make plans to keep VOA Georgian radio broadcasts on the air permanently. The BBG may try to fire him, as they did with previous VOA directors who had disobeyed their orders, but at least he would not be outrageously out of sync with the White House and the Congress. He might even get some of the $1 billion of Georgian aid money for VOA broadcasts.

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty president Jeff Gedmin should likewise expand Russian and Georgian broadcasts. (Both VOA and RFE/RL increased broadcasts to Georgia when the war started but not significantly.) Mr. Gedmin should also ask for money to make sure RFE/RL journalists can work without being exposed to an unacceptable level of dependency on the good will of the secret police and to protect them as much as possible from being pressured and intimidated.

What the BBG should be doing now, and what they should have been doing earlier, is to assist VOA, RFE/RL and their other entities in raising money for U.S. international broadcasting. It was also the BBG’s job to anticipate such events as Russia’s attack on Georgia and to be prepared for them. They should have known that Mr. Putin’s secret police tactics in dealing with journalists would have a major impact on RFE/RL’s operations in Russia and put them at a serious risk. The Broadcasting Board of Governors has failed on all counts and is now hopelessly out of sync with the White House, the Congress, and the mood of the American people.

  • Share/Bookmark

U.S. Taxpayers Pay for Spreading Racist Views on Radio Liberty in Russia


What Would Barack Obama Say If He Knew…

Commentary by Ted Lipien

FreeMediaOnline.org, San Francisco, August 29, 2008 — Why would U.S. taxpayers want to help a nationalist Russian politician spread his racist and anti-immigrant views on a radio station, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL)?  Radio Liberty is based in Moscow and Prague but is managed by the bipartisan broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), sitting in Washington, D.C., which takes money from the U.S. Congress.

The answer is, neither U.S. taxpayers nor members of Congress would tolerate  for a moment the misuse of their good name and money, if they only knew about it.

The Broadcasting Board of Governors knows well about such broadcasts. (BBG-managed  Alhurra Television for the Middle East gave airtime to an extremist who had called for killings of American soldiers in Iraq.)  When such broadcasts are exposed, the BBG tries to put the blame on individual managers and journalists, when in fact it bears a direct responsibility for having put in place policies that permit such broadcasts to go on the air in the first place. But rather than change its policies, it lets these outrages to continue.

Recently, the Moscow Human Rights Bureau has criticized Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) for giving an entire hour of airtime to a former Russian Parliament deputy Andrey Savel’yev. The Russian human rights organization said that Mr. Savel’yev’s  “chauvinist and racist views are well-known.” This may not mean much to most Americans, but it should. Those who are not familiar with racist politics in Russia should read Clifford J. Levy report from Moscow for the “New York Times” (August 28, 2008) about another Russian nationalist politician, Russia’s current representative to NATO, Dimitri O. Rogozin. He hung a poster of Stalin in his office in Brussels. The political party he led in Russia published “anti-immigrant ads showing dark-skinned immigrants throwing watermelon rinds on the ground.” Should U.S. taxpayers subsidize extensive interviews with Russian politicians connected with similar racist propaganda on a radio station managed by a group of prominent Americans?

In criticizing Radio Liberty for giving airtime to Mr. Savel’yev, the Russian human rights organization said Radio Liberty was guilty not only  of enabling such people “to spread their poisonous views,” but also of legitimizing their ideas “in the minds of many impressionable radio listeners.” The appeal, written by the organization’s head Aleksandr Brod, argues that stations, which “in their pursuit of higher ratings” invite such “nationalist radicals,” are giving these enemies of democracy a larger audience and exacerbating ethnic tensions.

RFE/RL management may argue that giving one hour of airtime to a nationalist politician whose “chauvinist and racist views are well known,” is legitimate under the principles of news reporting and journalistic freedom. The BBG may think the same since recently they have eliminated all Voice of America radio broadcasts to Russia originating from Washington, D.C. (12 days before Russia attacked Georgia.) They want Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which opens its studios in Moscow to nationalist, anti-immigrant extremists, be the only on-air radio voice in Russia for the American taxpayers.

I completely disagree with the BBG logic. When I worked as a journalist at the Voice of America between 1973 and 1993, we did on occasion interview reform-minded and  even hardline communist officials and reported on their statements, but we would never have given them one hour of airtime, or even anything close to 10 minutes. If they said something newsworthy, we would report it. But the extent of coverage we would devote to their statements would be determined by our commitment to promoting truthful reporting and journalistic freedom. These officials, even the ones viewed as communist reformers, saw interviews with Western journalists as an opportunity to influence public opinion without giving up their regime’s control over domestic media. Most of them were not known for holding extreme racist views, but we would still not give them any kind of significant access to our airwaves knowing that they were responsible for silencing democratic dissent. We were not going to reward them by letting them promote their policies at our expense.

During the Cold War, when RFE/RL was based in Munich, Germany, Radio Liberty broadcasters followed the same approach as VOA broadcasters to airing views by  the opponents of democracy. The reason Radio Liberty no longer follows these rules is a direct result of the policies adopted by the Broadcasting Board of Governors. Former and current BBG members — Norman Pattiz,  Edward E. Kaufman, and Jeff Hirschberg — all Democrats with links to Senator Biden, have been for years supporting the expansion of Radio Liberty broadcasts from Moscow and Prague and trying to silence Voice of America Russian broadcasts from Washington. (All the Republicans on the BBG, with perhaps one exception,  also supported these policies and joined forces with the Democrats.)

Obviously these distinguished Americans are not racists and they see themselves as defenders of freedom and democracy, yet they ignored warnings from Congress and from human rights organization and made decisions that have profoundly negative consequences for media freedom in Russia and in many other countries. (They also wanted to eliminate Voice of America radio broadcasts to Georgia and several other countries where media is censored and under government control. And they shut down VOA Russian radio broadcasts without making any public announcements that could have alerted ahead of time members of Congress and human rights activists.)

Several members of the BBG have strong backgrounds investing in commercial media and communications industry in a free market economy, but none of them had experienced what it means to live under a totalitarian dictatorship. They do not know first hand what it means to be forced to receive information and opinions from only one source of government-sponsored nationalist propaganda. Apparently, they have no clue what defenders of democracy in Russia must feel when they hear a racist politician on U.S.-taxpayer-funded Radio Liberty or what they must feel when they find out at about the same time that the Voice of America will not longer have radio programs in Russian from the United States.

There are no African Americans serving on the Broadcasting Board of Governors who could have reacted strongly to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty giving airtime to a racist politician. Although the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is an ex officio BBG member, she does not personally attend the Board’s meetings and most likely has not heard about the RFE/RL broadcast and the human rights organization’s protest. The lone BBG member who was reported questioning the Board’s policies in Russia and has spoken up against discontinuing Voice of America Russian radio programs is the only working journalist/broadcaster on the current Board. Blanquita Cullum, a woman with Hispanic and immigrant roots and experience in radio journalism, was said to have warned the other BBG members of the danger of underestimating Mr. Putin’s campaign against independent media. For the other BBG members — successful businessmen with experience in commercial U.S. broadcasting – shutting down VOA radio to Russia was primarily a business decision influenced by a desire to accommodate bureaucratic allies. The next president, whoever he is, would do well appointing BBG members whose main qualification is experience in journalism and defending human rights rather than the size of their financial contributions to political parties and political loyalty. 

By putting a great number of Radio Liberty broadcasters in Russia within the reach of Mr. Putin’s secret police and telling them they need to have programs that would appeal to and attract a large audience, the current Board completely undermined the traditional commitment of U.S. international broadcasting to democratic values and journalistic independence. The BBG also exposed vulnerable RFE/RL journalists to blackmail and other forms of intimidation and pressure from Russia’s security services.

Mr. Pattiz, who has since resigned from the BBG, was the architect of the business-driven model of international broadcasting, in which ratings have been presented as more important than content. He was also the biggest supporter of outsourcing U.S. taxpayer-funded broadcasts to semi-private entities with a large number of contracting jobs overseas while at the same time shutting down Voice of America operations in the United States staffed by federal U.S. workers.

Giving extensive airtime to a nationalist Russian politician and earlier comments made by Radio Liberty’s managers in Russia also make it clear that RFE/RL no longer engages in ”surrogate broadcasting,” as this radio station did with great distinction during the Cold War. By “surrogate” I mean alternative broadcasting based on specific values that most Americans would agree with rather than internal broadcasting conducted under the watchful eye of Mr. Putin’s secret police agents.  They no doubt rejoice that a station funded by American taxpayers gives airtime to nationalist extremists, some of whom may very well be controlled by the security services.

 

Murdered Russian Journalist Anna Politkovskaya.To find out – why the BBG model of relying on large news bureau operations in countries where the secret police is in charge of the local media is dangerous, does not promote press freedom, and cannot be called “surrogate broadcasting” – Read: Radio Liberty Russian managers put a positive spin on Putin’s comments about the murder of a pro-democracy journalist. The article shows the appalling reaction of Radio Liberty managers to the murder of independent Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya.

 

Read more in Surrogate Broadcasting 101 — Why BBG and RFE/RL Are Failing in Russia

 

The Russian human rights organization observed that stations such as Radio Liberty may try to defend themselves by saying that they invite racists and extremists ”not to help spread the ideas of the latter but rather to ensure that all points of view are presented, and thus to allow the extremists to expose the weakness of their positions relative to those of others.”  But the Russian human rights activists, as well as Voice of America journalists and many Radio Liberty journalists who are familiar with their station’s principles before the BBG took over, know that, especially under the conditions of totalitarian and authoritarian rule, a society ”should defend itself from the ideas of racism and hatred of everything human.” The Moscow Human Rights Group believes that such broadcasts promote racial violence. “Under conditions like those in contemporary Russia,” their statement says, ”such ideas are ‘directly’ applied in the streets.” Many immigrants, including Africans, have been beaten up and some have been killed by nationalist extremists in Russia.

The Senate Staff of Senator Biden was said to have worked with some BBG members and BBG staff to shut down VOA Russian radio despite strong bipartisan opposition in Congress to this idea. One of their objectives was to use some of the savings to beef up Radio Liberty operations. RFE/RL is incorporated in Delaware, Senator Biden’s home state. Mr. Pattiz, the billionaire founder of Westwood One radio empire, is one of Senator Biden’s rich backers.

I wonder if Barak Obama had a chance to read the “New York Times” report about racist media campaigns in Russia, what he would say about his running mate’s extraordinary support for Radio Liberty? How would he react to the BBG’s decision to stop VOA Russian radio broadcasts from Washington just days before the Russian attack on Georgia?  And if he saw what kind of racist ads nationalist parties in Russia use to intimidate immigrants, what would he say about Radio Liberty’s interview with a nationalist Russian politician who was accused by a human rights organization of spreading “chauvinist and racist views?”

Would the Democratic Party nominee for president be upset that American taxpayers paid for the broadcast and that the Broadcasting Board of Governors’ faulty policies allowed it to happen?  I think Senator Obama would be upset. I also hope that this will be a lesson for the BBG to change its policies and reverse some of their most damaging decisions.

Ted LipienTed Lipien's Book on AmazonThis commentary was written by FreeMediaOnline.org president Ted Lipien. He was an acting associate VOA director until 2006. Earlier, he had been in charge of VOA broadcasts to Poland and managed broadcasting to Russia and other countries in Eurasia. He was also responsible for placing VOA, RFE/RL and other BBG-funded programs on local radio stations in Russia, Georgia, Afganistan, Bosnia, Iraq, and many other media-at-risk countries. In his recently published book on Pope John Paul II and feminism, he describes Polish secret police and KGB attempts to place spies at the Vatican and to influence broadcasts by Radio Free Europe and the Voice of America.

  • Share/Bookmark

A New Book About Pope John Paul II and Feminism Also Deals with Cold War Spying at the Vatican and Attempts to Influence Reporting by RFE/RL and VOA

Wojtylas_Women_PB
I included here more information about “Wojtyla’s Women,” my book on Pope John Paul II and feminism. In the book, I discuss at some length the attempts of the Polish communist secret police and the KGB to recruit agents among Pope John Paul II’s friends, as well as their attempts to influence the reporting of journalists working at Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and the Voice of America. Some of these efforts were successful. Considering what has happened to the independent media under Mr. Putin’s leadership, there is little doubt that his secret police, the FSB, is just as busy now as they were when they were still Mr. Putin’s old employer, the KGB. (Mr. Putin is an ex-KGB operative.)

 

Some of the brave radio station owners in Russia told me in confidence that they had visits from the FSB officers who forced them to stop rebroadcasting VOA and RFE/RL programs. They were courageous to tell me about these visist because they could be prosecuted for revealing state secrets. Still, the Broadcasting Board of Governors cavalierly shuts down Voice of America radio broadcasts to Russia originating from Washington and thinks it is safe to do radio broadcasting from Moscow. RFE/RL journalists, many of whom are Russian citizens living in Russia with their families, are vulnerable to intimidation from the FSB.

 

Certainly, RFE/RL has many courageous journalists. During the Cold War, surrogate broadcasting was done from the West. But many journalists working within the Soviet Bloc became agents of the secret police and the majority were forced to write stories in support of the local regimes. The communist intelligence services even managed to recruit some agents who later worked for U.S. international broadcasters, although their number was very small. Any journalists and U.S. broadcasting resources placed within easy reach of Mr. Putin’s secret police are far more vulnerable than U.S.-based broadcasting and Voice of America journalists working in the U.S.

 

The BBG staff, some of whom know Russia quite well, should have advised the BBG members about these threats before shutting down VOA radio to Russia. It is also amazing that neither the BBG staff nor the Senate staff of Senator Biden did not see the implications of ending VOA Russian radio broadcast in terms of political symbolism and U.S. ability to communicate quickly with the Russian people in any future crisis. It is also amazing that they did not see that such a crisis would come sooner rather than later. It did 12 days after they shut down VOA Russian radio.

 

My guess is that they did know about these risks, while some BBG members may have not, but their desire to take resources from VOA in order to boost RFE/RL was just too great for them to resist.

 

I believe RFE/RL is a great institution and should be supported. RFE/RL broadcasting to Russia has some advantages over VOA broadcasting, just as VOA broadcasting to Russia has some advantages over RFE/RL broadcasting. At this time, however, due to the BBG decisions from the era of Mr. Pattiz and his consultants, RFE/RL has been put in a very dangerous position in Russia. My understanding, based on conversation with various sources, is that the current RFE/RL president, Jeff Gedmin, is trying to repair some of this damage, but he has not yet developed a new concept of safe surrogate broadcasting to countries like Russia, where the secret police is basically in charge of the media.

Wojtyla's Women: How They Shaped the Life of Pope John Paul II and Changed the Catholic ChurchWojtyla’s Women: How They Shaped the Life of Pope John Paul II and Changed the Catholic Church,” a book about Pope John Paul II and feminism by international journalist Ted Lipien who had interviewed Karol Wojtyla, offers a unique perspective on the late Pope’s views on women and American society.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, June 24, 2008 — John Paul II warned about the dangers of secular feminism but accepted of some of its ideas. A new book — Wojtyla’s Women — explores the role of remarkable women who shaped the life of Pope John Paul II, supported his concept of “New Feminism,” and changed the Catholic Church.

 

Ted Lipien’s new book, “Wojtyla’s Women: How They Shaped the Life of Pope John Paul II and Changed the Catholic Church,” published by the UK publisher O-Books and available on Amazon, reveals for the first time the role of remarkable women in the life of Karol Wojtyla and their impact on his papacy and the Catholic Church. The book also explores John Paul II’s views on feminism, gender roles, love, sex, abortion, and contraception in the context of unprecedented threats against human dignity during his lifetime, from pre-World War II anti-Semitism to the Holocaust, Nazi medical experiments on women prisoners, and communist dictatorship.

 

The book shows how John Paul II, the most charismatic and influential Pope in centuries, reshaped many facets of Catholic thought. Yet, as Ted Lipien demonstrates, Church policy on women during John Paul II’s papacy remained deeply resistant to popular modern ideas on gender roles. Wojtyla’s Women explores John Paul II’s views on women, marriage, family and sexual ethics from both feminist and conservative Christian perspectives. Previously untapped sources reveal the influence of his upbringing in Poland at the outset of the Twentieth Century, a time when deeply rooted traditions collided with rapid social change and new ideas, against a backdrop of war, genocide, and political oppression.

 

As the book reveals, Polish women were a remarkable and unexpected influence on John Paul’s understanding of gender issues and the Catholic Church’s theology. They were also the main force behind his advancement of New Feminism and Theology of the Body as alternatives to the Sexual Revolution and to radical and Marxist feminism in the West and in the communist world.

 

The future Pope John Paul II told Polish Catholics before becoming pope that “the affairs of the Kingdom of God” cannot be left only to women and that social advancement of women has in it a little bit of truth but also a great deal of error.” John Paul II was strongly opposed to ordaining women priests.

 

But while he could not reach an understanding with liberal Western women because of vast differences in how he and they were shaped by culture and history, Karol Wojtyla nevertheless supported many ideas embraced by secular feminists and broke with many misogynist Christian traditions.

 

“Wojtyla’s Women” also analyzes the considerable impact of John Paul II’s views and papacy on the abortion debate in the United States and his conflict with the Clinton Administration over U.S. policies on birth control programs and abortion in the Third World. Lipien writes in his book that John Paul II was successful in raising awareness of the moral aspects of abortion through his campaign of the culture of life versus the culture of death.” The book demonstrates, however, that Wojtyla’s campaign to promote natural birth control methods for women has not succeeded in any country, including his native Poland.

 

The author points out that John Paul II would have been appalled that the majority of U.S. presidential contenders in 2008 have been pro-choice, including the majority of those who are Roman Catholic: Joe Biden (D), Christopher Dodd (D), Rudolph Giuliani (R), Dennis Kucinich (D), Bill Richardson (D); only Senator Sam Brownback (R) and Alan Keyes (R), among former candidates who are Catholic, are pro-life.

 

Barak Obama (D), Hillary Clinton (D), and Senator McCain (R) belong to Protestant Christian Churches. Both Obama and Clinton are strongly pro-choice, while McCain is pro-life.

 

Ted Lipien reports in his book that Senator Joe Biden, who is a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, had said that he is prepared to accept the Catholic Church teaching that life begins at conception. Ted Lipien points out that John Paul II would have been gravely disappointed that abortion has not emerged in the U.S. as a major presidential campaign issue in 2008.

 

Ted Lipien’s book also reveals Pope John Paul II’s deep mistrust of Western liberalism and his condemnation of the United States as a continent marked by competition and aggressiveness, unbridled consumerism and corruption.” In addition to abortion, he was particularly troubled by the growing support among Americans for ordination of women priests and social and legal acceptance of gay marriages.

 

John Paul II doubted that the emergence of the United States at the end of the Cold War as the only superpower was good for the rest of the world and he strongly opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

 

Ted Lipien also reveals in his book how the KGB and the Polish communist security service recruited spies among John Paul II closest friends and their attempts to manipulate media coverage of his papacy. This part of Lipien’s book was cited in a recent news story about Senator Biden’s staff and the shutting down of the Voice of America radio broadcasts to Russia by the Broadcasting Board of Governors, BBG, shortly before the Russian attack on Georgia in early August. To see the news story, please visit www.TedLipien.com, Pope John Paul II and Women Blog, http://tedlipien.com/WojtylaWomen/, www.FreeMediaOnline.org, and Free Media Online Blog, http://freemediaonline.org/freemediaonlineblog/.

 

Ted Lipien is a former director of the Polish Service of the Voice of America and a journalist with more than 30 years of reporting and writing about politics, society, women’s issues, and the Catholic Church in Poland. He interviewed Karol Wojtyla shortly before the Polish cardinal became pope. Ted Lipien is also president and founder of FreeMediaOnline.org, a 501 (c) 3 nonprofit organization supporting media freedom worldwide. He lives in San Francisco.

 

For more information, please visit his website: www.TedLipien.com.

 

Wojtyla’s Women is available for purchase on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Wojtylas-Women-Shaped-Changed-Catholic/dp/1846941105/

  • Share/Bookmark

Senator Biden's Staff Said to Be Responsible for Weakening U.S. Foreign Broadcasts Prior to Russia's Attack on Georgia

FreeMediaOnline.org, August 23, 2008, San Francisco — In a move seen as a foreign policy embarrassment for Senator Obama’s vice-presidential running mate, the Senate staff of Senator Joe Biden was said to be involved in stopping  the Voice of America (VOA) radio programs to Russia just 12 days before Moscow launched its military attack on Georgia.  VOA is an  international broadcasting service funded by the U.S. Government which airs radio programs mostly to countries experiencing political repression and press censorship.

According to a source within the bipartisan but Bush-appointed Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which manages VOA and other government sponsored U.S. broadcasting, Senator Biden’s staff has worked behind the scenes with the BBG staff to kill VOA Russian radio broadcasts and almost succeeded in closing down VOA radio service to Georgia.

The Senate staff of Senator Biden,  whom Senator Obama selected primarily because of his strong foreign policy experience, is said to have told the BBG staff that it would be safe to terminate VOA broadcasts to Russia and to say that the Congress was “on board” with this decision.  Other than Senator Biden, most members of Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, however, have been strongly opposed to the BBG-proposed  Voice of America radio and television programming cuts to media-at-risk countries.

On July 17, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) warned the BBG and the Bush Administration not to stop VOA radio broadcasts  to Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tibet and to the Balkans, “where freedom of speech remains restricted and broadcasting is still necessary.” The BBG ignored his warning and terminated VOA radio to Russia on July 26 without making any public announcements. Russian tanks rolled into Georgia on August 8.

According to FreeMediaOnline.org, a media freedom non-profit, Senator Biden’s staff  is said to have worked with a few members of the BBG and the board’s executive director, Jeff Trimble, to deprive the Voice of America of resources to broadcast on-air radio to Russia in favor of a semi-private entity, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), which is based in Prague, the Czech Republic, and has a large news bureau in Moscow staffed by Russian citizens. RFE/RL is incorporated in Delaware, Senator Biden’s home state. Senator Biden’s former chief of staff, Edward E. Kaufman, is a BBG member. Another BBG member, Jeff Hirschberg, also a Democrat, is a director of the U.S.-Russia Business Council, according to the BBG website. The BBG’s executive director was formerly acting president of RFE/RL.

FreeMediaOnline.org president, Ted Lipien, a former acting VOA associate director who had worked also for the BBG, placing VOA, RFE/RL, and other BBG-sponsored programs in Russia, Bosnia, Afghanistan  and Iraq, said that stopping VOA radio to Russia is seen as a “gift to Mr. Putin for his crackdown on independent media.” Lipien wrote a book about Pope John Paul II, in which he described communist secret police attempts to spy on the Vatican and influence Western media reporting. He warned that Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty journalists, whom he described as having a great record of fighting press censorship during the Cold War and still doing an outstanding job in some places and in individual cases, have now been exposed as a group working in Russia to intimidation by the Russian secret police.

Lipien blamed the BBG for putting RFE/RL in a dangerous position in Russia and in several other media-at-risk countries. He said that the Board’s action, in which Senator Biden’s staff is said to be involved, has seriously undermined the ability of the American people to communicate with the Russian people in peacetime and in any future crisis.

Since the Russian attack on Georgia, the BBG has agreed to continue VOA radio broadcasts to Georgia “for the forseeable future” but, according to FreeMediaOnline.org sources, it has refused as “a non starter” urgent pleas from VOA journalists to resume broadcasts to Russia. Due to budget restrictions ordered by the BBG, only four VOA Georgian broadcasters were left to respond to the crisis. FreeMediaOnline.org reported that they have been working with hardly any days off to produce an expanded 60 minute daily broadcast.

 

Since the official announcement today by Senator Obama that Senator Biden will indeed be his vice-presidential running mate, I have revised the story and posted it on Blogger News Network. I hope the story will help in getting a clarification from Senator Biden on the future of the Voice of America Russian radio broadcasts and might convince the BBG to reconsider their recent decisions and actions taken by their staff.

  • Share/Bookmark