Archive for November, 2009

Critics call Poland Patriot missile plan a symbolic gesture

U.S. Army Pfc. Joshua Womack of Foxtrot Battery checks the cables leading to the launch tubes of a Patriot Missile Air Defense System during exercise Beverly High 04-07 at Kunsan Air Base, Korea on Dec. 13, 2004. (USAF Photo by Staff Sgt Alan Port) (RELEASED)Opinia.USOpinia.US SAN FRANCISCO — An article in the U.S. semi-official military newspaper Stars and Stripes suggests that the Obama administration’s plan for placing a limited number of Patriot missiles in Poland has no military significance and is being implemented largely for diplomatic reasons to appease Warsaw after President Obama scrapped President Bush’s far more ambitious anti-ballistic missile defense system.


Stars and Stripes is published by the Pentagon but maintains editorial independence. The Obama administration, eager to get Russia’s cooperation in dealing with Iran, is putting out several conflicting public relations messages. After cancelling the Bush anti-ballistic missile defense plan in an effort to appease Russia, it wants to appease Poland and other Central European nations by promoting a militarily insignificant Patriot missile placement. At the same time, the U.S. administration also wants to send a signal to Russia that the Patriot system to be placed in Poland has little military value and will not lead to a large number of U.S. soldiers being stationed in Poland.

Governments in Central Europe are concerned by President Obama’s concessions to Moscow at the expense of  U.S. allies in the region and his unwillingness to criticize the Kremlin for its authoritarian policies at home and aggressive behavior toward Russia’s neighbors. There was no public protest from the Obama administration when Russia recently staged the largest military exercises near Poland’s eastern border in the last 20 years. Russian troops practiced simulated attacks on Poland. According to unconfirmed Polish media reports, use of nuclear weapons was part of the exercise.

The Poles believe that President Obama’s foreign policy goals in dealing with countries like Russia, Iran and Cuba are based on naive assumptions. They also realize that the proposed Patriot system is of little military value to them but want a larger number of U.S. soldiers to be stationed in Poland as an extra guarantee of U.S. commitment to protect its ally against Russia. That number is not expected to be large but will be greater than the contingent of six American soldiers who are currently stationed in Poland.

End of Opinia.US report. Republication is permitted.

Read the Stars and Stripes article by Nancy Montgomery:

Critics call Poland Patriot missile plan a symbolic gesture

Germany-based unit is likely to be sent as early as the spring

By Nancy Montgomery, Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Thursday, November 26, 2009

HEIDELBERG, Germany — Soldiers from U.S. Army Europe’s Patriot missile battalion could be deploying to Poland as soon as the spring for a six-month rotation as part of the Obama administration’s new missile defense plan in Eastern Europe.

But critics say the Patriot deployment — the first to put U.S. troops in Poland — is nothing more than a symbolic, diplomatic gesture. READ MORE

SourcedFrom Sourced from: Opinia.US

  • Share/Bookmark

Cleaning house at the BBG; former CNN CEO to manage U.S. international news programs

FreeMediaOnline.org Logo. FreeMediaOnline.org, Free Media Online Blog, November 18, 2009, San Francisco — Walter Isaacson, Chairman of the U.S.-Palestinian Partnership, at a State Department briefing, April 29, 2008. Photograph released by the U.S. State Department.One of the worst managed U.S. federal agencies will have a new leadership. President Obama has announced his intention to nominate former CNN chairman and CEO Walter Isaacson, a Democrat, to chair the Broadcasting Board of Governors, BBG, Read more…

  • Share/Bookmark

Obama diplomacy lost in confusion

President Obama with President PutinTedLipien.com TedLipien.com, SAN FRANCISCO — Speaking softly to dictators while insulting faithful allies seems to be the essence of President Obama’s confused diplomacy.
 

The Obama administration has repeatedly offended Poland’s pride in recent months, making Polish officials extremely suspicious and anxious about foreign policy and military commitments of the new U.S. administration. First, President Obama made public his strong desire to “reset” relations with Moscow, based apparently on a naive assumption that Russian leaders would help him deal with nuclear Iran, as if helping the U.S. could ever advance their own authoritarian ambitions. He later declined the Polish government’s invitation to attend the 70th anniversary commemoration of the outbreak of World War II, which was held in Gdansk, the birthplace of Solidarnosc, on September 1, a date of great historical importance to the Poles. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was there along with other foreign dignitaries.

 

This American diplomatic snub, combined with the fact that the White House and the State Department were silent during the summer, as various Russian government officials and Kremlin supporters defended Stalin and his pre-World War II pact with Hitler, did not escape the attention of Polish leaders and the Polish public. The Hitler-Stalin pact resulted in Poland’s partition by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, with the Soviet attack launched on September 17, 1939.

 

The final blow came when President Obama made his decision to cancel U.S. plans to build the anti-ballistic missile system in Poland and the Czech Republic, and chose to announce it on the very day the Poles were commemorating the tragic anniversary of the Soviet invasion of their country. Countless public diplomacy experts in the White House and the State Department, including President Obama’s future ambassador to Poland, did nothing to prevent this completely avoidable insult. Wired headline said it all: Dear Poland, Happy Soviet Invasion Day. Love Uncle Sam.

 

Alarmed by naive foreign policy statements coming from Washington, Lech Walesa, Vaclav Havel and other Central European leaders had sent a letter to President Obama in July 2009, warning him of the Kremlin’s aggressive behavior toward Russia’s neighbors. The mishandling of the ballistic missile defense (BMD) issue and subsequent events have shown that their alarm was justified, but their warnings have been ignored.

 

Finally, after an outcry of media criticism following the September 17 missile shield cancellation announcement, the White House hastily dispatched Vice President Joe Biden on a face-saving mission to Central Europe. While visiting Poland, Romania and the Czech Republic, Mr. Biden praised the courage of pro-democracy demonstrators who toppled communist regimes in 1989 while facing tanks and occasional gunfire.

 

But these Central Europeans, who easily saw through communist propaganda and like to match actions with words, could not fail to notice that only a few days earlier Mr. Biden’s boss had refused to meet in Washington with the revered Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. This was apparently out of fear of offending the aging Chinese communist leaders, who were not brandishing guns but merely frowning at him thousands of miles away from the White House. U.S. NATO allies in Central Europe also learned from news reports that, citing scheduling conflicts, President Obama had canceled his plans to attend the 20th anniversary observances in Germany of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will represent the U.S. Hoping to score a public diplomacy coup, Russia’s President Dmitri Medvedev later announced that he would attend along with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and a score of other heads of state.

 

Mr. Obama is too busy to go to Berlin to honor those who fought against communism in Eastern and Central Europe. The White House did say that he would meet the Dalai Lama, but only after his official presidential visit to China. Reacting to this news, former Czech president and human rights activist Vaclav Havel sadly observed that “these minor compromises start the big and dangerous ones.”

 

Repeated diplomatic blunders of the Obama administration embolden dictators who now see the U.S. president as a weak and ineffective leader. They are likely to act upon this perception by further restricting human rights and press freedoms in their countries, while also threatening their smaller neighbors. This is bad news for America and the spirit of freedom that sustained the 1989 peaceful overthrow of communism in Eastern Europe.

 

The White House would like everyone to believe that bad translators and hostile media are misinterpreting President Obama’s foreign policy initiatives. The State Department recently blamed a Polish translator for undiplomatic remarks by President Obama’s new ambassador in Warsaw, Lee A. Feinstein, who hinted in a television interview that Poland plans to increase its engagement in Afghanistan.

 

While the hint was believed to be accurate, Polish government officials were furious that it was made public before foreign minister Sikorski’s scheduled visit to Washington. They did not want the Polish public to learn about it from the U.S. ambassador while sensitive negotiations were still being conducted. To make things worse, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cancelled her meeting with Sikorski when she decided to extend her trip to the Middle East.

 

The latest diplomatic crises with Poland show a new level of incompetence as well as arrogance of the new Obama administration foreign policy team. The real problem with Obama diplomacy are not bad translators and journalists, but naive assumptions, surprising arrogance and dangerous incompetence. The world needs a U.S. president whose diplomacy is not lost in confusion.

 

 

 

Ted Lipien was in charge of Voice of America radio broadcasts to Poland during the Solidarity movement’s successful struggle for democracy. He now runs a media freedom nonprofit in San Francisco, CA.

 

Your email:

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Obama diplomacy lost in translation

U.S. Ambassador to Poland Lee A. FeinsteinTedLipien.com TedLipien.com, SAN FRANCISCO — In angry late-night phone calls to reporters last week, State Department diplomats were defending careless comments by President Obama’s new ambassador in Warsaw, Lee A. Feinstein, who revealed on Polish TV the content of sensitive negotiations with the U.S. about increasing the number of Polish troops in Afghanistan. Polish officials had good reasons to keep this information confidential and were understandably angry.

 

The war in Afghanistan is not popular with the Polish people, and neither is the idea of committing more Polish troops to help President Obama who removed the U.S. missile shield from Poland on the anniversary of the invasion of the country by the Soviet Union in 1939. He had earlier declined the Polish government’s invitation to participate in the 70th anniversary observances of the start of World War II. And Secretary of State Clinton cancelled her scheduled meeting in Washington this week with visiting Polish foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorski, when she unexpectedly extended her visit to the Middle East. He was going to discuss with her, among other things, Poland’s contribution to the war on terror in Afghanistan.

 

As to the earlier diplomatic scandal, State Department and U.S. Embassy officials tried to place fault with a Polish translator who admittedly used two extraneous words while interpreting the ambassador’s controversial remarks during a television interview. The interpreter added the words, “soldiers” and “Polish contingent,” when translating Ambassador Feinstein’s answer, in which he praised the Polish prime minister’s and president’s “commitment to being in Afghanistan, and,” he added, “actually to enhance its presence in Afghanistan.”

 

In a strong and angry reaction to this undiplomatically revealing answer, Polish Defense Minister Bogdan Klich said that “the ambassador committed a blunder.” “Neither the prime minister, nor the minister of foreign affairs, nor the minister of national defense,” said Mr. Klich, “made any declarations to the American side about an increase in the contingent.”

 

It was obvious that the U.S. envoy was implying some kind of a military commitment. While the translator made a minor error, the translation did not distort the ambassador’s essential message. The English-language Krakow Post and other Polish media outlets analyzed the transcript and came to the same conclusion.

 

Lee A. Feinstein’s public remarks deeply embarrassed Polish government leaders, who in an attempt to help their country’s declining standing with the Obama administration may have made vague promises to Vice President Joe Biden during his recent visit to Warsaw about increasing their military engagement in Afghanistan. But under no circumstances they wanted the Polish public to hear about it first from the U.S. envoy at a time when most Poles feel that President Obama ignores and does not understand their country.

 

Even the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw admitted in a news item posted on its official website prior to Ambassador Feinstein’s arrival in Warsaw, and still available online, that deep disappointment in Mr. Obama is a common sentiment shared by the Poles. Yet despite the insults, Poland was planning to send a few hundred extra soldiers to Afghanistan. The Polish leaders know that their strategic military alliance with the United States and Poland’s friendship with the American people must be kept strong regardless of who occupies the White House at the moment.

 

Your email:

 

  • Share/Bookmark